2016
This report estimates we are actually on track for global warming of up to 3.4 degrees Celsius.
Climate policy in the Netherlands is not going away. After a slow run-up from the 1990s, more concrete goals and plans have been made since the Paris Agreement in 2015. With the targets of the Rutte-III and Rutte-IV administrations, climate policy has become an integral part of society. This also applies to the rest of Europe: with the Green Deal, European Climate Law and Fit for 55, there is a clear ambition to move towards a climate-neutral society.
However, the current Dutch plans are insufficient to meet the national 55% target. Moreover, if you add up all the national plans, the world is also not on track to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement. The table below shows the expected rise in average global temperature, as analyzed by the unep emissions gap report.
Finding
2016
This report estimates we are actually on track for global warming of up to 3.4 degrees Celsius.
2020
The world is still heading for a temperature rise in excess of 3°C this century.
2021
New national climate pledges combined with other mitigation measures put the world on track for a global temperature rise of 2.7°C by the end of the century.
2022
Policies currently in place point to a 2.8°C temperature rise by the end of the century. Implementation of the current pledges will only reduce this to a 2.4-2.6°C temperature rise by the end of the century, for conditional and unconditional pledges respectively.
2023
If current policies are continued, global warming is estimated to be limited to 3°C. Delivering on all unconditional and conditional pledges by 2030 lowers this estimate to 2.5°C, with the additional fulfilment of all net-zero pledges bringing it to 2°C.
2024
A continuation of current policies is estimated to limit global warming to a maximum of 3.1°C (range: 1.9–3.8) over the course of the century. The full implementation and continuation of the level of mitigation effort implied by unconditional or conditional NDC scenarios lower these projections to 2.8°C (range: 1.9–3.7) and 2.6°C (range: 1.9–3.6), respectively.
In the table below you can also compare the Dutch emissions with those of other countries.
| wdt_ID | Country | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 1996 | 1995 | 1994 | 1993 | 1992 | 1991 | 1990 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 213 | Afghanistan | 29 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 29 | 29 | 27 | 23 | 21 | 17 | 17 | 16 | 15 | 16 | 15 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| 214 | Albania | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 11 |
| 215 | Algeria | 282 | 278 | 269 | 266 | 263 | 253 | 239 | 235 | 215 | 207 | 204 | 202 | 197 | 194 | 186 | 178 | 175 | 163 | 157 | 164 | 155 | 149 | 147 | 147 | 144 | 137 | 135 | 127 | 126 | 121 |
| 216 | Andorra | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 217 | Angola | 128 | 120 | 131 | 134 | 136 | 130 | 128 | 126 | 127 | 127 | 122 | 120 | 117 | 113 | 115 | 115 | 112 | 105 | 102 | 81 | 88 | 90 | 81 | 82 | 76 | 73 | 70 | 67 | 67 | 66 |
| 218 | Antigua en Barbuda | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 219 | Argentina | 399 | 405 | 408 | 403 | 436 | 429 | 431 | 421 | 416 | 435 | 429 | 450 | 445 | 433 | 418 | 414 | 398 | 376 | 379 | 337 | 338 | 330 | 325 | 319 | 308 | 306 | 302 | 302 | 297 | 293 |
| 220 | Armenia | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 25 | 25 |
| 221 | Australia | 608 | 621 | 627 | 578 | 569 | 570 | 554 | 640 | 640 | 596 | 626 | 609 | 638 | 638 | 590 | 628 | 576 | 653 | 656 | 651 | 633 | 594 | 567 | 557 | 558 | 550 | 544 | 542 | 541 | 541 |
| 222 | Austria | 70 | 68 | 72 | 70 | 69 | 68 | 72 | 71 | 74 | 77 | 72 | 78 | 79 | 82 | 84 | 84 | 83 | 78 | 77 | 65 | 65 | 67 | 67 | 68 | 64 | 62 | 62 | 62 | 67 | 63 |
Dilemmas remain in climate policy. How do you balance between emissions, costs and support? Do you focus primarily on national reduction or is the European context the most important? Do you produce fossil products in the Netherlands for which there is still global demand or do you (quickly) phase out all fossil industry? Per sector these dilemmas will be different, but in principle the choices always revolve around three options: (1) reduce demand; (2) reduce emissions per unit of demand and (3) switch to a sustainable alternative to meet demand. In the game, make climate tables you can decide yourself about these dilemmas.
There are so many topics not covered in this deep dive. For example, why climate policy is so important and what the consequences are and will be for the Netherlands. Also, the prospects beyond 2030 were not discussed: how do we eventually achieve nearly zero emissions in 2050? And topics that are regularly in the news, such as geopolitics, energy poverty, hydrogen and grid congestion, have also not received the attention they deserve. It is absolutely worthwhile (and necessary) to dig deeper into these issues.
This deep dive was finalized in February 2023. Using the KEV, there will be an annual update with the latest figures.
The information of this deep dive is mainly based on the following documents:
part 1
Rutte-III coalition agreement and the National Climate Agreement
part 2
official European publications and the Rutte-IV coalition agreement
part 3
the Climate and Energy Outlook from 2019 onwards.
Supplementary to this, government communications, PBL analyses and the Climate Notes were read to further supplement the information from these documents.
The best analysis on climate change can be found in the IPCC reports. Read the latest synthesis rapport for a summary of all climate science. Or explore adaptation, mitigation or the natural sciences in three separate reports. You can also read further on relevant topics such as tipping points tipping points in other studies.
On an annual basis reports are published that provide insight into the latest climate figures. These include the dutch climate and energy outlook, unep emissions gap report, unfccc ndc synthesis report and the iea world energy outlook. Often these are published toward the end of the year.
Podcasts are also good (and often entertaining) sources for climate policy analysis. For example, listen to (Dutch podcasts) voetnoten or studio energie or more clarity on Dutch climate policy. International, political analysis can be heard in outrage + optimism and stories about climate solutions in how to save a planet.
Sometimes it's nicer to absorb a (fictional) story rather than a serious reading. Discover climate novels that suit you in, for example, these articles from The Guardian, grist and business insider. Or watch films about climate change such as a life on our planet, don’t look up, or the biggest little farm.
Climate Tables is certainly not the only game about climate change. For example, you can save the Netherlands from a water disaster in pandemic rising tideOr build a sustainable electricity grid in gigawatt. Prefer to work together to combat climate change? In that case, choose daybreak. And you can have your species adapt to a dynamic ecosystem in evolution: climate.
Finally, it's also worthwhile (and fun) to do something yourself. Choose a study or employer where you can further learn about and contribute to addressing climate change. Join an association or organization where you can meet other climate enthusiasts. Make conscious choices in what you do and consume. Share stories and insights with friends and family. Create new, fun products so we all build more climate knowledge.
We hope you now know more about Dutch climate policy. To make the deep dives better for everyone, we would like to receive feedback. Please fill in below (anonymously) what you think are the positive elements and points of improvement.
Reviews make it clear to new people whether this deep dive is for them. Write a public review below that we can post on our website.
If you have come across something in this deep dive that was incorrect, let us know via contact@solfem.nl. Through this, we can make the deep dive better for everyone.